Commentary

black-and-latino-students-fail-make-gains-boston-latin-despite-expanded-test-preparation

In "Diversity gap at Boston Latin proving stubborn" or as described in the online url: 'black_and_latino_students_fail_make_gains_boston_latin_despite_expanded_test_preparation' there are a number of glaring failures of reporting. It is not that a "disparity in diversity became a concern last year"; it is an issue that has been festering since the collapse of the Exam School Initiative over ten years ago. Framing the issue as a "golden opportunity" not taken advantage of is imprecise. Failing to question the premise of having a test program targeted at kids with high test scores does little to challenge our education leaders. Maybe the Globe needs to rock the 'meritocracy'. Mayor Walsh, when will it the right time to talk about 'policies to increase opportunities for people of color'? This has been going on for 17 years, "We've got to take time to build this" rings false, Mike Contompasis.

There are models out there of successful programs. Berklee's City Music, UMB's PCEP are getting the job done. Bottom line: this a BPS problem and we need BPS to fix it. Exam school opportunities for the top, hardest working students in every K-8, elementary and middle school in Boston have to start earlier and continue longer if we are to succeed for our kids.

Mr. McKenna -- I'm consdiering your letter regarding Boston Latin for publication. However, I'm ignorant of "UMB's PCEP." Can you tell me what that is, and what those letters stand for? Yours, Jon Garelick

Hi Jon,

Sorry about the acronyms especially since its ungooglable, getting this down from 400 to 200 words required some tricks.

UMASS Boston has a number of pre-collegiate programs. Probably the most well known is the Talented and Gifted (TAG) Latino Program. The one I am most familiar with was for high school kids who didn't have the high enough SAT scores for admission. We would bother the program office to get our kids in; I was teaching at West Roxbury High, this was almost 10 years ago. It may have morphed to the Admission Guaranteed Program that is now happening at the Burke, Dorchester and South Boston.

It was way longer than 2 weeks, and it wasn't test prep. It was more like a the classic freshman seminar, taught by professors with lots of reading and writing, lasting 6 weeks the summer before the start of classes. You may know that 70% of Boston non-exam school students admitted to college end up in one or more remedial classes (you pay tuition but they don't count). One year I got seven of my students into the program, all of them passed the Accuplacer, skipping remedial classes, 5 of them successfully finished freshman year and continued as sophomores.

There are things in common between this program and others like Berklee's City Music. They happen off-site at the institution; the kids get a taste of how the other half lives. They make a strong commitment to the kids. UMASS Boston continued with programs after the start of classes, City Music gives kids a private lesson one afternoon an ensemble on Saturday and then a six week summer program. None of them are based upon test prep;.

I can imagine what Boston middle schoolers would think if they were exposed to the Black Box Theatre, the Art and Sculpture Studios, the extensive sports and music programs that are the best that the Latin Alumni Association can buy. Perhaps they could imagine themselves succeeding at Latin.

off point by Tom Ashbrook on Ulysses S. Grant

In the midst of the Native American protest over the Dakota pipeline, it is appalling to me how 'off point' a radio host could be. Ashbrook, in what is becoming a WBUR tradition, panders to his guests, is ill informed on his topic and oblivious to his topic's relation to life today in this country.

Ulysses S Grant called native Americans 'wards of the nation' who do not 'harmonize well with others' and should be placed on reservations. His 'permanent peace' was more like cultural genocide. He presided over the massacre of the buffalo and agressive milatry action against Native Americans. His Indian Appropriations Act ended treaty making,

Meanwhile 140 people get arrested in North Dakota many placed in dog kennels, get fired upon by sound cannons and tear gas. All this in response to a peaceful protest.

Failing to make any connection at all is irresponsible journalism.

My son and a co-worker came in during the broadcast. 'Why don't you just turn it off' they said. I find myself doing that more and more often.

Nonsolar users bear burden of net metering

THE SOLAR ENERGY BOOM in Massachusetts has been exciting and there is little debate over whether further expansion is important. We are strong supporters of solar energy, but only at the right price for the state’s businesses, municipalities, and residents, including low-income customers. It is they — not utilities — who are shouldering the high cost of electricity produced by solar power. Share Tweet 29 Comments As the conversation about how to finance the future of solar energy in Massachusetts continues, it is important to set the record straight about what maintaining the status quo — or raising the net metering cap — means for utility customers statewide, as well as what it means for solar developers. CONTINUE READING BELOW ▼ Net metering – one of the state’s solar incentives – rewards solar energy owners or developers by paying them for the power they produce at the same rate they would pay if these owners and developers were consuming electricity from the grid. This rate includes payment for benefits and services that solar developments do not provide. In addition, when solar sites produce more than they consume, they don’t have to pay for services such as the use of the wires and poles operated and maintained by the utility and financed by utility customers. For large solar projects, these reimbursements far exceed the value they bring to the electric system. As a result, Massachusetts pays more per kilowatt-hour of solar energy than anywhere else in the nation, and about twice as much as neighboring New England states. This leaves utility customers who do not have solar with a grossly inequitable share of the burden of Massachusetts’ overpriced solar energy. Given this structure and steep subsidies, it is no surprise that developers are feverishly pushing for an increase of the net-metering cap. The Net Metering Task Force, on which we served, estimated that nonsolar customers will pay nearly $4 billion between now and 2020 if current policies remain in place. That is unfair and unsustainable. We support the creation of new policies that continue to promote the expansion of solar energy in Massachusetts without forcing nonsolar customers to subsidize millions of dollars in profits for developers. In the meantime, we believe that raising the cap is not needed to ensure the ongoing development of solar power installations. This is evidenced by the applications — for systems of various sizes — that National Grid continues to receive even after meeting its cap. The cap does not apply to residential projects or those that produce electricity to be used exclusively on site. In addition, net metering is not the only incentive for solar. Let’s not rush to strap customers with paying for additional subsidies for the solar power industry before we shine some sunlight on the real costs and benefits of solar for everyone in the state. Bob Rio is senior vice president of Associated Industries of Massachusetts. Amy Rabinowitz is deputy general counsel for National Grid. Camilo Serna is vice president of strategic planning and policy for Eversource.

It is disingenuous of our utility companies blame our high electric bills on solar energy. Our bills have been high for years. Our energy has been derived from non-renewable fossil fuels and nuclear power sold to us by a different power conglomerate every few years. Solar is a threat to their business model. Now every electricity user with a south facing roof can become a producer.up every few years. to claim that as a result of net net metering "Massachusetts pays more per kilowatt-hour of solar energy than anywhere else in the nation" Massachusetts electric costs were high even before net metering, so what is the intent of the utilities in blaming it on solar?

Hazards tied to medical records rush

Subsidies given for computerizing, but no reporting required when errors cause harm

By Christopher Rowland | GLOBE STAFF JULY 20, 2014

One job that might be appropriate for governments is the creation of standards.

Bay State's big selloff

re: Bay State's big selloff by Richard Gillispie Boston Globe Op-Ed 7/27/7

Richard Gillespie has found an interesting crease in the social fabric through which to slip in a rationale for privatization. While corporations can jettison their responsibilities to their workers and retirees, the public sector depends on a more ponderous political process.

From a capitalist perspective there is a lot of value in our communities. The wealth is spread evenly, the difference in wages and benefits between our lowest paid state workers and our highest paid public officials is no where near the differences seen in the private sector between workers' and stockholders' earnings; an enticing amount of fat poised to move up the food chain and into executives/stockholders coffers. Yet, this even distribution is what gives our communities their strength. Our public workers can become part of the fabric of our society with the economic power to contribute to their communities.

Despite our federal government's mission of making the world safe for privatization, there is nothing democratic or free or even American in this value. Corporations are not citizens, we are the citizens. Selling off our communities so that we can re-apply for our jobs at lower pay and worse benefits is not the solution.

Tim McKenna
12 Parley Vale
Jamaica Plain, MA 02130
tim@sitebuilt.net
617 524 0938(h)
857 498 2574(m)

next target: the prevailing wage law

next target: the prevailing wage law Next target: the prevailing wage law - The Boston Globe

Perhaps we should just take eveybody's job away, let them get real hungry then bring them into a big arena. The field could be separated into two sections, 13% of the people could go in the union section, the other 87% in the other. Crumbs could be thrown down from the skyboxes with more crumbs going to the union section. People could then compete against each other by fighting for the crumbs thrown down from the skyboxes. The people cry out for more crumbs. The jumbotron responds: "Reduce the union section if you want more crumbs for yourself". We could then force the winners to have to give some of their crumbs to the losers. The jumbotron would declare that was because of taxes: "reduce taxes keep more of your crumbs". The people are outraged. Allow them to vote on the way out of the arena. Maybe you could sell chances on a seat in the skyboxes too.

Ah efficiency and discipline, the core values of privatization. Free market efficiency might get the job done for $25/hr or even $15/hr but what does that get society? Do we have strong communities where people can own a home, send their kids to college, save for retirement?